Virmach Piscataway Data Center, New Jersey, USA VPS Evaluation Data

During Black Friday, Virmach’s activities were very popular, and bloggers also followed the trend and grabbed two. One was the OpenVZ chick from the Seattle computer room, and the other was the KVM chick from the Piscataway computer room. They are free today. Yes, I have done a review on the Seattle Chicken before. Today I have some free time, so I will also do a review on the Piscataway Computer Room’s Chicken, for everyone’s reference.

solusvm panel configuration information

I installed Debian8 system, the memory is 3.75G, the hard disk is 10G (isn’t it useless), and the traffic is 750G per month

Script test machine configuration

KVM architecture, configuration information is the same as in the panel.

-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- CPU model: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of CPU cores: 1 CPU frequency: 2599.998 MHz Total hard drive size: 9.6 GB (0.9 GB Used) Total memory size: 3711 MB (378 MB Used) SWAP size: 255 MB (0 MB Used) Boot time: 0 days, 0 hour 7 minutes System load: 0.32, 0.08, 0.03 System: Debian GNU/Linux 8 Architecture: x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel: 3.16.0-4-amd64 Virtualization platform: kvm -------------------------------------------------- --------------------------

Hard disk IO test

There is no limit on IO, SSD hard drive.

Hard drive I/O (first test): 107 MB/s Hard drive I/O (second test): 460 MB/s Hard drive I/O (third test): 407 MB/s

Foreign node download test

Node name IP address Download speed Latency CacheFly 205.234.175.175 20.7MB/s 1.475 ms Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 7.80MB/s 177.784 ms Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 5.44MB/s 277.658 ms Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 15.3MB/s 72.081 ms Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 19.4MB/s 83.919 ms Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 23.7MB/s 85.505 ms Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 21.5MB/s 48.136 ms Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 18.9MB/s 62.364 ms Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 15.6MB/s 82.640 ms Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 9.06MB/s 234.695 ms Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 10.7MB/s 209.175 ms

China mainland node download test

Node name Upload speed Download speed Latency Xiangyang Telecom 78.23 Mbit/s 92.21 Mbit/s 375.192 ms Shanghai Telecom 59.85 Mbit/s 107.57 Mbit/s 355.318 ms Xi'an Telecom 16.95 Mbit/s 58.46 Mbit/s 388.192 ms Shanghai Unicom 79.94 Mbit/s 66.47 Mbit/s 239.294 ms Chongqing China Unicom 16.83 Mbit/s 119.86 Mbit/s 300.249 ms Beijing Unicom 60.28 Mbit/s 39.33 Mbit/s 370.112 ms Hunan Telecom 9.69 Mbit/s 66.77 Mbit/s 430.474 ms

Latency status of various nodes in mainland China

Hefei: 265.57 ms Beijing: 228.96 ms Wuhan: 239.4 ms Changji: 254.58 ms Chengdu: 247.73 ms Shanghai: 252.1 ms Taiyuan: Fail Hangzhou: 246.76 ms Ningxia: 263.52 ms Hohhot: 240.25 ms Nanchang: Fail Lhasa: 296.74 ms Urumqi: 301.45 ms Tianjin: 215.0 ms Xiangyang: Fail Zhengzhou: 251.74 ms Shenyang: 228.17 ms Lanzhou: 251.26 ms Harbin: 279.94 ms Ningbo: 239.52 ms Suzhou: 215.6 ms Jinan: 257.64 ms Xi'an: 243.32 ms Xining: 266.69 ms Chongqing: 264.63 ms Shenzhen: Fail Nanjing: 213.4 ms Changsha: 238.32 ms Changchun: 264.97 ms Fuzhou: 255.6 ms

Tracing route

Let’s look at telecommunications first Below is China Unicom mobile routing Mobile backhaul routing

traceroute to 223.111.182.65 (223.111.182.65), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.3.0.149 (10.3.0.149) 0.430 ms 2 10.3.0.145 (10.3.0.145) 0.654 ms 3 vl202-br1.pnj1.choopa.net (108.61.16.81) 7.390 ms 4 10.64.0.18 (10.64.0.18) 1.298 ms 5 10.64.0.253 (10.64.0.253) 1.048 ms 6 Unassigned230.nyiix.net (198.32.160.230) 1.569 ms 7 223.118.10.58 (223.118.10.58) 1.563 ms 8 223.118.10.186 (223.118.10.186) 72.192 ms 9 221.183.15.145 (221.183.15.145) 248.371 ms 10 221.176.17.61 (221.176.17.61) 248.434 ms 11* 12 221.183.18.2 (221.183.18.2) 307.573 ms 13* 14* 15* 16 promote.cache-dns.local (223.111.182.65) 304.012 ms

China Unicom return routing

traceroute to 103.222.189.1 (103.222.189.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.3.0.149 (10.3.0.149) 4.456 ms 2 10.3.0.145 (10.3.0.145) 7.666 ms 3 vl202-br1.pnj1.choopa.net (108.61.16.81) 13.719 ms 4 10.64.0.18 (10.64.0.18) 12.895 ms 5 nyk-b2-link.telia.net (62.115.149.38) 7.620 ms 6 sjo-b21-link.telia.net (62.115.119.229) 74.836 ms 7 chinaunicom-ic-127288-sjo-b21.c.telia.net (213.248.73.190) 265.926 ms 8 219.158.102.197 (219.158.102.197) 240.298 ms 9 219.158.24.137 (219.158.24.137) 243.581 ms 10 219.158.24.125 (219.158.24.125) 243.078 ms 11 219.158.12.2 (219.158.12.2) 248.550 ms 12 112.85.230.146 (112.85.230.146) 253.533 ms 13* 14 112.85.218.150 (112.85.218.150) 260.204 ms 15* 16 103.222.189.1 (103.222.189.1) 254.773 ms

Telecom backhaul routing

traceroute to 118.119.254.1 (118.119.254.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 10.3.0.149 (10.3.0.149) 0.905 ms 2 10.3.0.145 (10.3.0.145) 1.126 ms 3 vl202-br1.pnj1.choopa.net (108.61.16.81) 4.925 ms 4 10.64.0.18 (10.64.0.18) 1.119 ms 5 10.64.0.253 (10.64.0.253) 1.101 ms 6 8-2-1-101.ear3.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.15.213.213) 1.899 ms 7 ae-1-9.edge2.SanJose3.Level3.net (4.69.209.181) 74.291 ms 8 CHINA-TELEC.edge2.SanJose3.Level3.net (4.53.210.110) 72.650 ms 9 202.97.86.178 (202.97.86.178) 76.630 ms 10 202.97.22.121 (202.97.22.121) 224.066 ms 11 202.97.91.146 (202.97.91.146) 221.107 ms 12 202.97.94.149 (202.97.94.149) 225.245 ms 13 202.97.36.226 (202.97.36.226) 253.961 ms 14 222.213.9.34 (222.213.9.34) 260.126 ms 15 118.119.254.1 (118.119.254.1) 261.917 ms Summary: The stability of the machine is good, and the IO is also good, but the circuit is too poor. It is only suitable for use as a foreign trade station. The memory is relatively high. You can use a WIN system to run some software, such as: Huotou Car and Guanguan.

Recommended site search: foreign server rental price, domain name information query, free domain name space, registration-free virtual host, .net virtual host, server in the United States, free cloud server, free all-purpose space application, free virtual host in the United States, mainland China The best web hosting,