Z.COM Japan Cloud Host KVM VPS Host Performance Speed ​​Experience Simple Evaluation

Z.COM’s cloud VPS host has been talked about a lot lately, so we’re going to give it a try. Anyway, you’ll get 1,000 yen or 2,000 yen for free when you sign up, and it’s billed by the hour. If it’s not easy to use, just cancel. Got it! Now this site has opened a Japanese node vps host to play with. If you want to try it out and don’t have an account, you can register one first. The official website: z.com (you can currently get a 2,000 yen voucher through this link).

I have to say that such a good domain name is used for such a service, really... But GMO Group has many... Its configuration is no different from conoha, and even the price is the same! Now this site is running a Japanese node, the one configured with 1G memory, let’s record a simple test record!

First, basic configuration plan

If you register, use the promotional link to get a 2,000 yen voucher. In addition, you need to recharge 500 yen to activate the vps service, so I chose the 1GB memory plan (1GB memory, 2 cores, 2T traffic, 50GB SSD), the rest depends on your specific needs. Anyway, this configuration is enough for ordinary websites! However, what is different from conoha is that the traffic is limited, 100M incoming and outgoing bandwidth!

Second, overview of file download speeds on foreign networks

System Info
----------
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz
CPU Cores: 2
Frequency: 2599.994 MHz
Memory: 1006 MB
Swap: 2015 MB
Uptime: 1:55,
OS: CentOS release 6.6 (Final)
Arch: i686 (32 Bit)
Kernel: 2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.i686
Hostname: 133-130-118-79
Speedtest (IPv4 only)
--------------------------
Your public IPv4 is 133.130.***
Location Provider Speed
CDN Cachefly 18.3MB/s
Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 2.02MB/s
Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 13.6MB/s
Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 9.42MB/s
San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 15.0MB/s
Washington, DC, US Softlayer 7.77MB/s
Tokyo, Japan Linode 16.7MB/s
Singapore Softlayer 9.71MB/s
Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 290KB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 15.9MB/s
Disk Speed
----------
I/O (1st run): 729 MB/s
I/O (2nd run): 1.1 GB/s
I/O (3rd run): 1.1 GB/s
Average I/O: 243.733 MB/s

Using CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz

Third, PING speed test

Fourth, MTR route tracing test

Fifth, hard disk IO performance test

[root@133-130-118-79 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.81031 s, 46.2 MB/s
[root@133-130-118-79 ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=8k count=256k conv=fdatasync
262144+0 records in
262144+0 records out
2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 2.6938 s, 797 MB/s

Sixth, install AMH free version test

******* SSH Dirs *******
WebSite: /home/wwwroot
Nginx: /usr/local/nginx
PHP: /usr/local/php
MySQL: /usr/local/mysql
MySQL-Data: /usr/local/mysql/data
Start time: Sat Nov 21 19:10:02 CST 2015
Completion time: Sat Nov 21 20:19:51 JST 2015 (Use: 9 minute)
More help please visit:http://amysql.com
================================================== ==============

Seventh, UnixBench simple test

-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Nov 21 2015 20:23:54 - 20:52:06
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 25050563.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2776.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3122.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 461722.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 121976.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1277772.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 882259.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 221840.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8240.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5135.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1003.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2417051.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25050563.5 2146.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2776.3 504.8
ExeclThroughput 43.0 3122.8 726.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 461722.1 1166.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 121976.7 737.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1277772.7 2203.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 882259.3 709.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 221840.0 554.6
Process Creation 126.0 8240.7 654.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5135.0 1211.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1003.0 1671.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2417051.5 1611.4
 ========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1018.8

-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Nov 21 2015 20:52:06 - 21:20:19
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 49739077.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5568.1 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7516.6 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 662778.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 182462.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2146259.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1546063.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 440387.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 22055.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8216.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1157.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3942591.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 49739077.0 4262.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5568.1 1012.4
ExeclThroughput 43.0 7516.6 1748.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 662778.1 1673.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 182462.6 1102.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2146259.3 3700.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1546063.7 1242.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 440387.3 1101.0
Process Creation 126.0 22055.5 1750.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8216.6 1937.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1157.9 1929.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3942591.2 2628.4
 ========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1807.1

To summarize, the domain name can be said to be high-end and classy. It belongs to the GMO Group and has little chance of running away. Nowadays, there are more Chinese people staying. It is recommended to register for one month and then activate it. After all, I don’t know about this 2,000 yen giveaway event. When will it end! The current telecommunications lines in Japan are a bit slow, I will test the ones in Singapore later!

Recommended site searches: large bandwidth server rental, Guangdong server hosting, China IP segment, domain name information query, website server rental, mainland China virtual host mobile host, domain name and host, space server, US host reviews,