oneasiahost simple evaluation

The oneasiahost VPS tested in this article has 128M memory, 256M burst, 5G hard drive, 100G monthly traffic, an independent IP, the familiar SolusVM management panel, server 100M bandwidth sharing, server parameters: Intel i7-2600 Quad Core 3.4Ghz, 32GB RAM, 6x 1TB HDD Hardware RAID10. Take a look at the CPU: root@hello:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor: 0 vendor_id: GenuineIntel cpu family: 6 model: 42 model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz stepping : 7 CPU MHz: 3392.394 cache size: 8192 KB physical id: 0 siblings : 8 coreid: 0 CPU cores: 4 APIID: 0 initial API: 0 fpu: yes fpu_exception: yes cpuid level: 13 wp: yes flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 moni "undescriptable" ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx lahf_lm arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_"undescriptable" vnmi flexpriority ept vpid bogomips : 6784.78 clflush size: 64 cache_alignment: 64 address sizes: 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: Run the download and see the speed: root@hello:~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test –2012-10-20 01:03:16– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 180.210.201.204 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|180.210.201.204|:80… connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `100mb.test’

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 9.99M/ s in 10s

2012-10-20 01:03:27 (9.94 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600] Hard drive DD test: root@hello:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 2.65078 s, 101 MB/s

The following is the overall comprehensive test of UBI (you won’t know much about the results): ================================================== ====================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: hello: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-042stab061.2 — #1 SMP Fri Aug 24 09:07:21 MSK 2012 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″) CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz (6784.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 01:07:12 up 3 days, 5:18, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01; runlevel 2

—————————————————————— Benchmark Run: Sat Oct 20 2012 01:07:12 – 01:35:20 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 18790111.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3260.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4617.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 579078.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 166324.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1576334.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1056860.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 133953.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 12269.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5916.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 659.4 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 841685.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 18790111.1 1610.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3260.2 592.8 ExeclThroughput 43.0 4617.7 1073.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 579078.2 1462.3 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 166324.9 1005.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1576334.0 2717.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1056860.9 849.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 133953.3 334.9 Process Creation 126.0 12269.6 973.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5916.5 1395.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 659.4 1099.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 841685.2 561.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 998.0

Guangzhou China Unicom Route Tracking: Take a look at the routing: C:\Users\Administra"Undescribable">tracert 116.251.210.16 Trace route to 116.251.210.16 over up to 30 hops 1 18 ms 18 ms 19 ms 120.85.184.1 2 21 ms 23 ms 19 ms 120.80.175.201 3 20 ms 19 ms 36 ms 120.80.0.157 4 44 ms 45 ms 49 ms 219.158.99.125 5 52 ms 52 ms 49 ms 219.158.3.234 6 49 ms 48 ms 50 ms 219.158.97.58 7 88 ms 83 ms 86 ms 203.208.146.37 8 155 ms 160 ms 164 ms 203.208.173.173 9 110 ms 111 ms 109 ms so-7-0-0-0.sngc3-ar4.ix.singtel.com [203.208.152 .33] 10 109 ms 109 ms 108 ms 203.208.171.170 11 114 ms 110 ms 114 ms 203.208.145.246 12 122 ms 114 ms 123 ms 203.208.255.198 13 119 ms 119 ms 147 ms 202.176.211.36 14 118 ms 113 ms 119 ms edge-1.v71.globalswitch.sg.gs [203.175.175.132] 15 116 ms 116 ms 113 ms 116.251.210.241 16 118 ms 111 ms 111 ms 116.251.210.16 Tracking completed.

chinaz’s results:

Recommended site search: foreign virtual host, foreign vps server rental, cloud server rental, domain name registration fee, Hong Kong proxy server, overseas virtual host, game server defense, org domain name, dual line dual IP, free US host, < /p>