bluevm evaluation: 4g memory/100g hard drive/3T traffic/monthly payment 3.3 knives

888u

Last update at :2024-04-16,Edit by888u

I published an article about this product before: bluevm-4g memory/100g hard drive/3T traffic/monthly payment of 3.3 dollars. Several friends bought it. I didn’t have the extra money to buy it myself, so I always wanted to find some evaluation data. Today Reprint the data of netizen "Swear": Purchase address of this VPS PS: Personally, I think the following data can give you a good reason to buy, so that you don't need to be demanding about VZ's cost-effectiveness!

Let’s take a look at the UBI benchmark first System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 18898330.7 1619.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3106.1 564.7 ExeclThroughput 43.0 6348.1 1476.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 724142.8 1828.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 210080.4 1269.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1820986.6 3139.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1205176.9 968.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 351642.1 879.1 Process Creation 126.0 20261.6 1608.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6641.8 1566.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2135.7 3559.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 929600.6 619.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1377.2

System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 53401548.7 4576.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11756.3 2137.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 17631.6 4100.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 580784.4 1466.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 157175.6 949.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1483604.6 2557.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3581785.0 2879.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1089901.6 2724.8 Process Creation 126.0 55168.7 4378.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 20154.9 4753.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2828.9 4714.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2874701.3 1916.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2777.5

DD test, 256mb and 1G were tested three times and two times respectively. [root@mfacdpft ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.44655 seconds, 77.9 MB/s [root@mfacdpft ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.77418 seconds, 71.1 MB/s [root@mfacdpft ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.1846 seconds, 84.3 MB/s [root@mfacdpft ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 14.5043 seconds, 74.0 MB/s [root@mfacdpft ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 13.1953 seconds, 81.4 MB/s

WGET download speed test: [root@mfacdpft ~]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test –2013-05-22 23:53:03– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `100mb.test.1′

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 28.5M/ s in 3.5s

2013-05-22 23:53:07 (28.4 MB/s) – `100mb.test.1′ saved [104857600/104857600]

chinaz’s ping value:

Look at DD and wget at different times, the effect is obvious:

Recommended site searches: website registration and cancellation, US server, cheap domain name, US host review, expired registered domain name query, virtual host, foreign server, cloud service organ network, overseas host, Japanese proxy server IP,

bluevm evaluation: 4g memory/100g hard drive/3T traffic/monthly payment 3.3 knives

All copyrights belong to 888u unless special state
取消
微信二维码
微信二维码
支付宝二维码