艰难的选择：Ramnode Vs Digitalocean

Personally speaking, choosing a VPS is nothing more than considering the price, VPS resource configuration, VPS hen stability, and lines. Generally speaking, these factors are our first choice. Among the low-priced VPS, we chose ramnode and digitalocean. And I think it is very suitable for Chinese people if they use it to build websites without trouble. Someone asked why you didn’t choose other brands for comparison? Don’t I think these two companies are pretty reliable on the West Coast of the United States? Here let me compare ramnode and digitalocean! Visit www.ramnode.com, www.digitalocean.com

Let’s first briefly talk about the situation of the two companies:

Ramnode was founded by NICK.A in 2012. It has been in operation for almost 13 months so far. The total number of servers is less than 100. The data centers are in Atlanta and Seattle, and the server ports are all G ports.

Digitalocean was founded in 2012. It has at least 19 team members (officially announced). It has been in operation for less than one year and has received venture capital. It currently has nearly 300,000 VPSs. It is estimated that the number of servers is 1,000-3,000. (Maybe a little watery), the data centers are New York and San Francisco in the United States and Amsterdam in the Netherlands, and the server ports are also G ports.

Here we also compare the KVM VPS with 512M memory:

Ramnode:: 512M memory, 2 CPU Cores @ 3.3GHz+, 10G SSD, 2000G monthly traffic, 1IPV4, 16 IPv6, weekly backup, price 12 USD (discount price 7.8)! Digitalocean: 512M memory, 1 CPU Cores @ 2299.998GHz+, 10G SSD, 1000G monthly traffic, 1IPV4, unknown IPv6, no backup by official default, one-click backup and restore in the background, price 5 US dollars!

UnixBench: Ramnode: single core 1434.5, dual core 2287.6 Digitalocean: Single-core 1296.2 only

DD: Ramnode: dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync 1.59708 s, 672 MB/ Digitalocean:dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync 3.39088 s, 317 MB/s

I/O Pings: Ramnode:10 requests completed in 9003.3 ms, 4897 iops, 19.1 mb/s Digitalocean:10 requests completed in 9005.8 ms, 2335 iops, 9.1 mb/s

Network: Both are G ports, ramnode is in Seattle, Washington; digitalocean is in San Francisco, California, download data Ramnode: Cachefly 57.8 MB/ Digitalocean: Cachefly 35.7 MB/s

Summary: Ramnode is a oneman, relying on word of mouth, and the possibility of server abuse is relatively small; digitalocean is a company, relying on the limelight, and the possibility of server abuse is relatively high

Finally, I would like to send you two reviews that I have written before: ramnode-128M memory/5GSSD/1 core VPS simple evaluation

digitalocean kvm vps simple evaluation (512M San Francisco)

Recommended site searches: registration query, ip query network, domain name space registration, Korean cn2 server, is there a fee for domain name registration, Korean independent server, registration-free host in mainland China, address check by ip, US server website, renting high-defense IP ,