WeLoveServers, a simple evaluation of VPS - an artifact, you deserve it

WeLoveServers, regarding this artifact, posted some evaluation data for everyone to take a look. I would like to thank "Mao Daye" for its achievements. Children's shoes who want to buy WeLoveServers but are still wandering, why don't you kneel down? ! Okay, let’s not talk nonsense. To be honest, this company’s OVZ is really reliable. Let’s take a look at the data: [Purchase Link]

Let’s take a look at the general VPS information: RAM 2048 MB HDD 62GB CPU Model Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz CPU Cores 8 CPU Speed ​​3399 MHz CPU Cache 8192 KB

Tell you directly the result of unix bench mark: UnixBench UnixBench (w/ all processors) 5468.9 UnixBench (w/ one processor) 1923.1

Look at the detailed process of UBM: # # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #

Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation 1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

8 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

8 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

8 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

8 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

8 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Process Creation 1 2 3

8 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

8 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

================================================ ========================= BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System:****************** OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-042stab079.6 — #1 SMP Mon Aug 26 19:47:50 MSK 2013 Machine: x86_64 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”ANSI_X3.4-1968″, collate=”ANSI_X3.4-1968″) CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 02:56:00 up 51 min, 1 user, load average: 0.11, 0.23, 0.48; runlevel 2

—————————————————————— Benchmark Run: Sat Jan 04 2014 02:56:00 – 03:24:10 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 39841611.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4458.2 MWIPS (10.5 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5105.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 958505.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 274645.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2457426.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1982132.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 208825.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 15578.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 14388.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4262.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2768960.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 39841611.6 3414.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4458.2 810.6 ExeclThroughput 43.0 5105.7 1187.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 958505.0 2420.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 274645.1 1659.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2457426.5 4236.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1982132.8 1593.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 208825.7 522.1 Process Creation 126.0 15578.3 1236.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 14388.2 3393.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4262.2 7103.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2768960.9 1846.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1923.1

—————————————————————— Benchmark Run: Sat Jan 04 2014 03:24:10 – 03:53:09 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 157136254.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 34824.0 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 25068.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 998400.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 254960.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3000460.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 7426981.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 1340172.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 73340.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 46568.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6035.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 8357795.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 157136254.3 13465.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 34824.0 6331.6 ExeclThroughput 43.0 25068.6 5829.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 998400.2 2521.2 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 254960.5 1540.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3000460.2 5173.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 7426981.3 5970.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1340172.6 3350.4 Process Creation 126.0 73340.0 5820.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 46568.4 10983.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 6035.7 10059.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 8357795.1 5571.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 5468.9

I/O Pings

ioping -c 10 request=1 time=0.1 ms request=2 time=0.1 ms request=3 time=0.1 ms request=4 time=0.1 ms request=5 time=0.1 ms request=6 time=0.1 ms request=7 time=0.1 ms request=8 time=0.1 ms request=9 time=0.1 ms request=10 time=0.1 ms

10 requests completed in 9001.6 ms, 10741 iops, 42.0 mb/s

ioping-RD 15267 iops, 59.6 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.1/209.2/1.9 ms

ioping-RL 3788 iops, 946.9 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.3/1.4/0.0 ms

ioping-RC 989116 iops, 3863.7 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.0/0.1/0.0 ms

dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync 11.8778 s, 90.4 MB/s dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 7.27022 s, 148 MB/s dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k oflag=dsync 5.47801 s, 196 MB/s dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync 11.6439 s, 92.2 MB/s

100M file download speed: Cachefly 99.4 MB/s Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA 17.8 MB/s Linode, Dallas, TX, USA 31.0 MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 11.8 MB/s Linode, London, UK 8.78 MB/s OVH, Paris, France 4.81 MB/s SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands 6.86 MB/s Hetzner, Nuernberg, Germany 741 KB/s iiNet, Perth, WA, Australia 3.30 MB/s MammothVPS, Sydney, Australia 1.06 MB/s Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL 8.54 MB/s Leaseweb, Manassas, VA, USA 6.43 MB/s Softlayer, Singapore 6.67 MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA 1.05 MB/s Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA 94.0 MB/s Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA 16.3 MB/s

Recommended site searches: Ministry of Industry and Information Technology registration website, which Hong Kong server is fast, Suqian server, server rental, Hong Kong IP, independent IP host, mobile agent IP, US domain name registration, Wanwang space price, foreign server vps,