SpeedyKVM 12GB Memory KVM VPS Seattle Simple Review

Details: SpeedyKVM 2017 discount code, minimum 1GB memory KVM VPS, only $16.80 The following is the test of SEA-SSD 33. IPv6 has been configured.

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

CPU model: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of cores: 4 CPU frequency: 2199.996 MHz Total size of Disk: 170.0 GB (0.8 GB Used) Total amount of Mem: 11910 MB (301 MB Used) Total amount of Swap: 255 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime: 0 days, 0 hours 3 minutes Load average: 0.03, 0.07, 0.02 OS: CentOS 6.6 Arch: x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel: 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 -------------------------------------------------- ------------------- I/O speed (1st run): 188 MB/s I/O speed (2nd run): 436 MB/s I/O speed (3rd run): 428 MB/s Average I/O speed: 350.7 MB/s -------------------------------------------------- ------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 166MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 16.9MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 9.14MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 13.5MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 10.2MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 89.8MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 45.1MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 108MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 8.87MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 11.2MB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 8.69MB/s -------------------------------------------------- ------------------- Node Name IPv6 address Download Speed Linode, Atlanta, GA 2600:3c02::4b 28.8MB/s Linode, Dallas, TX 2600:3c00::4b 36.2MB/s Linode, Newark, NJ 2600:3c03::4b 30.3MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 2400:8901::4b 10.4MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 2400:8900::4b 11.7MB/s Softlayer, San Jose, CA 2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4 54.4MB/s Softlayer, Washington, WA 2607:f0d0:3001:78::2 257KB/s Softlayer, Paris, FR 2a03:8180:1301:8::4 14.1MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 2401:c900:1101:8::2 11.2MB/s Softlayer, Tokyo, JP 2401:c900:1001:16::4 17.5MB/s

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Sprint (Austin, TX) [7.23 km]: 75.909 ms Testing download speed........................................ Download: 251.52 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................ Upload: 30.63 Mbit/s

3. Mainland China access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

hdparm -t /dev/vda1 /dev/vda1: Timing buffered disk reads: 1346 MB in 3.00 seconds = 448.56 MB/sec

5. UnixBench scores for performance testing

Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 29 2017 22:02:50 - 22:31:09 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 25967703.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3150.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2346.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 690790.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 185560.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1595298.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1303258.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 267346.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 6366.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4636.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1830.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2018568.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25967703.4 2225.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3150.8 572.9 ExeclThroughput 43.0 2346.1 545.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 690790.6 1744.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 185560.8 1121.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1595298.9 2750.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1303258.3 1047.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 267346.3 668.4 Process Creation 126.0 6366.5 505.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4636.9 1093.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1830.6 3051.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2018568.2 1345.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1160.1 -------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 29 2017 22:31:09 - 22:59:25 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 103135098.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 12524.6 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 11863.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 591929.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 156624.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2047791.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 5136663.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 975646.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 35011.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 15221.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2071.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4423304.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 103135098.6 8837.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12524.6 2277.2 ExeclThroughput 43.0 11863.9 2759.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 591929.5 1494.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 156624.4 946.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2047791.7 3530.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 5136663.8 4129.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 975646.4 2439.1 Process Creation 126.0 35011.5 2778.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 15221.2 3589.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2071.1 3451.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4423304.3 2948.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2847.0

6. Packet loss test

Ping from 192.168.1.186 to 23.227.xxx.xxx ================================================== ============================ 03/31 10:59:10.554 Ping to 23.227.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 03/31 10:59:10.925 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 23.227.xxx.xxx: time=365ms TTL=50, ave=365.00ms 03/31 10:59:11.910 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 23.227.xxx.xxx: time=364ms TTL=50, ave=364.50ms 03/31 10:59:12.928 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 23.227.xxx.xxx: time=381ms TTL=50, ave=370.00ms 03/31 10:59:15.176 Timeout #5 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 03/31 10:59:15.930 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 23.227.xxx.xxx: time=384ms TTL=50, ave=374.20ms 03/31 10:59:16.934 PingMax #7 Reply 32 bytes from 23.227.xxx.xxx: time=387ms TTL=50, ave=376.33ms 03/31 10:59:22.947 PingMax #13 Reply 32 bytes from 23.227.xxx.xxx: time=396ms TTL=50, ave=381.00ms 03/31 10:59:24.165 Timeout #14 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 03/31 10:59:24.935 PingMax #15 Reply 32 bytes from 23.227.xxx.xxx: time=398ms TTL=50, ave=382.31ms 03/31 10:59:28.172 Timeout #18 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 03/31 10:59:29.948 === 20 valid sent, 17 received, 15.00% lost, 384.71ms average === --- Results & Statistics------------------------------------------------- ---------- Start time: 2017/03/31 10:59:10 Elapsed time: 000:00:19 End time: 2017/03/31 10:59:29 ---------------- 20 total sent 0 Invalid reception (other errors except timeout) ---------------- 20 valid sent 17 valid reception 3 timed out (15.00% lost) Ping minimum value 364ms, maximum value 398ms, average value 384.71ms

7. Route tracing

Recommended site searches: domain name registration query, free domain name space, Hong Kong vps host, icp registration center, virtual host purchase for 0 yuan, ip reverse check independent ip host, ftp free space domain name purchase, overseas virtual host space,