Hostigation 256MB Memory KVM VPS Los Angeles Simple Review

Details: Hostigation: $12.5/year/256MB/10GB space/500GB traffic/KVM/Los Angeles It is indeed Los Angeles and mainland China optimized routes, the price is right, and the stability is good!

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

CPU model: QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.5.3 Number of cores: 1 CPU frequency: 2599.998 MHz Total size of Disk: 8.9 GB (1.4 GB Used) Total amount of Mem: 238 MB (77 MB Used) Total amount of Swap: 1023 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime: 0 days, 0 hours 0 minutes Load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00 OS: CentOS 6.9 Arch: i686 (32 Bit) Kernel: 4.10.10-1.el6.elrepo.i686 -------------------------------------------------- ------------------- I/O speed (1st run): 607 MB/s I/O speed (2nd run): 678 MB/s I/O speed (3rd run): 658 MB/s Average I/O speed: 647.7 MB/s -------------------------------------------------- ------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 54.9MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 6.94MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 3.92MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 4.25MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 4.31MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 12.7MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 23.0MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 24.3MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 3.46MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 523KB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 761KB/s

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Atlantic Metro (Los Angeles, CA) [1.30 km]: 73.844 ms Testing download speed........................ Download: 591.74 Mbit/s Testing upload speed........................ Upload: 197.15 Mbit/s

3. Mainland China access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 27.7827 s, 9.7 MB/s

5. UnixBench scores

Benchmark Run: Sat Apr 15 2017 08:26:52 - 08:55:06 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 17331032.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2878.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5454.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 705123.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 187049.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1699752.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1291165.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 216985.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 13674.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4798.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 650.0 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1474530.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 17331032.5 1485.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2878.3 523.3 ExeclThroughput 43.0 5454.9 1268.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 705123.8 1780.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 187049.1 1130.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1699752.6 2930.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1291165.5 1037.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 216985.1 542.5 Process Creation 126.0 13674.3 1085.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4798.9 1131.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 650.0 1083.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1474530.0 983.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1128.9

6. Packet loss test

Ping from 192.168.1.243 to 69.85.xxx.xxx ================================================== ============================ 04/15 21:08:33.439 Ping to 69.85.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 04/15 21:08:34.180 Timeout #1 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 04/15 21:08:34.619 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 69.85.xxx.xxx: time=174ms TTL=51, ave=174.00ms 04/15 21:08:35.608 PingMin #3 Reply 32 bytes from 69.85.xxx.xxx: time=173ms TTL=51, ave=173.50ms 04/15 21:08:37.175 Timeout #4 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 04/15 21:08:37.613 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 69.85.xxx.xxx: time=175ms TTL=51, ave=174.00ms 04/15 21:08:38.608 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 69.85.xxx.xxx: time=176ms TTL=51, ave=174.50ms 04/15 21:08:42.172 Timeout #9 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 04/15 21:08:44.794 PingMax #12 Reply 32 bytes from 69.85.xxx.xxx: time=362ms TTL=51, ave=195.56ms 04/15 21:08:47.826 PingMax #15 Reply 32 bytes from 69.85.xxx.xxx: time=388ms TTL=51, ave=224.08ms 04/15 21:08:48.828 PingMax #16 Reply 32 bytes from 69.85.xxx.xxx: time=397ms TTL=51, ave=237.38ms 04/15 21:08:49.848 PingMax #17 Reply 32 bytes from 69.85.xxx.xxx: time=416ms TTL=51, ave=250.14ms 04/15 21:08:52.627 === 20 valid sent, 17 received, 15.00% lost, 242.41ms average === --- Results & Statistics------------------------------------------------- ---------- Start time: 2017/04/15 21:08:33 Elapsed time: 000:00:19 End time: 2017/04/15 21:08:52 ---------------- 20 total sent 0 Invalid reception (other errors except timeout) ---------------- 20 valid sent 17 valid reception 3 timed out (15.00% lost) Ping minimum value 173ms, maximum value 416ms, average value 242.41ms

7. Route tracing

Recommended site search: website server, latest free proxy IP, foreign free all-purpose space, Hong Kong server, website domain name query system, Taiwan proxy server, Hong Kong server, Hong Kong server rental, IP purchase, what is the server,