Positive reviews: Simple review of 100tb-$5 VPS in Los Angeles data center

Yesterday, a useful 100tb VPS was released. If you are not interested, you can continue reading "Recommended: 100tb-5 USD/KVM/512m memory/25gSSD/2T traffic (Windows)/free SSL unlimited issuance"; in fact, you know: I'm such a poor person, I can't afford to pay 20 euros for an online.net, not to mention a vps.net and a cloud.net to renew. Although, I really want to buy a 100tb.com VPS. I tested it but gave up due to financial pressure; fortunately, "suhu" in the group provided me with one, so I have the following simple VPS parameters:

Official website: www.100tb.com

Default official template: debian 7-64 bit, lists all processes:

root@la:~# ps auxw -H USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RVPS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 2 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [kthreadd] root 3 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [ksoftirqd/0] root 5 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [kworker/u:0] root 6 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [migration/0] root 7 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [watchdog/0] root 8 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 00:51 0:00 [cpuset] root 9 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 00:51 0:00 [khelper] root 10 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [kdevtmpfs] root 11 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 00:51 0:00 [netns] root 12 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [sync_supers] root 13 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [bdi-default] root 14 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 00:51 0:00 [kintegrityd] root 15 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 00:51 0:00 [kblockd] root 16 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [kworker/0:1] root 17 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [khungtaskd] root 18 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [kswapd0] root 19 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SN 00:51 0:00 [ksmd] root 20 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [fsnotify_mark] root 21 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 00:51 0:00 [crypto] root 107 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [khubd] root 140 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [vballoon] root 143 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 00:51 0:00 [ata_sff] root 144 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [scsi_eh_0] root 145 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [scsi_eh_1] root 146 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [kworker/u:1] root 180 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [jbd2/vda1-8] root 181 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 00:51 0:00 [ext4-dio-unwrit] root 446 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 00:51 0:00 [kpsmoused] root 447 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [kworker/0:2] root 1672 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 00:51 0:00 [rpciod] root 1674 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 00:51 0:00 [nfsiod] root 2411 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 00:51 0:00 [flush-254:0] root 1 0.0 0.1 10648 804 ? Ss 00:51 0:00 init [2] root 323 0.0 0.2 21456 1360 ? Ss 00:51 0:00 udevd –daemon root 452 0.0 0.1 21380 992 ? S 00:51 0:00 udevd –daemon root 453 0.0 0.2 21380 1056 ? S 00:51 0:00 udevd –daemon root 1636 0.0 0.1 18972 876 ? Ss 00:51 0:00 /sbin/rpcbind -w statd 1667 0.0 0.2 23344 1296 ? Ss 00:51 0:00 /sbin/rpc.statd root 1681 0.0 0.0 25296 424 ? Ss 00:51 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.idmapd root 1947 0.0 0.2 52772 1488 ? Sl 00:51 0:00 /usr/sbin/rsyslogd -c5 daemon 1996 0.0 0.0 16672 156 ? Ss 00:51 0:00 /usr/sbin/atd root 2004 0.0 0.1 4116 628 ? Ss 00:51 0:00 /usr/sbin/acpid root 2040 0.0 0.1 20380 840 ? Ss 00:51 0:00 /usr/sbin/cron ntp 2096 0.0 0.4 39072 2296 ? Ss 00:51 0:00 /usr/sbin/ntpd -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -g -u 104:106 root 2110 0.0 0.2 49936 1208 ? Ss 00:51 0:00 /usr/sbin/sshd root 2565 0.0 0.6 71264 3524 ? Ss 00:59 0:00 sshd: root@pts/0 root 2571 0.0 0.5 20052 2784 pts/0 Ss 01:00 0:00 -bash root 2641 0.0 0.2 16832 1244 pts/0 R+ 01:01 0:00 ps auxw -H root 2640 0.0 0.5 49936 2884 ? Ss 01:01 0:00 sshd: [accepted] 101 2378 0.0 0.1 46812 984 ? Ss 00:51 0:00 /usr/sbin/exim4 -bd -q30m root 2404 0.0 0.1 16256 932 tty1 Ss+ 00:51 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty1 root 2405 0.0 0.1 16256 932 tty2 Ss+ 00:51 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty2 root 2406 0.0 0.1 16256 932 tty3 Ss+ 00:51 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty3 root 2407 0.0 0.1 16256 924 tty4 Ss+ 00:51 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty4 root 2408 0.0 0.1 16256 936 tty5 Ss+ 00:51 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty5 root 2409 0.0 0.1 16256 928 tty6 Ss+ 00:51 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty6 root@la:~#

This chick was just opened by suhu:

494M memory, no swap added:

After updating and installing the necessary components with apt-get:

Give 1 core. Since it is KVM virtualized, I don’t know which one it is. My guess is: Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2. Frequency: 2.40GHz

Officially: SSD 25G

Test the hard disk I/O as usual:

Change it:

Network situation: G port is correct

Guangzhou Telecom:

Guangzhou Telecom:

Unix Bench mark, do you believe the effect of this machine? Does this mean it's idling?

To sum up: the performance is absolutely top-notch, which has a lot to do with the fact that the official registration has been strictly reviewed before opening an account. The resources are sufficient, and the network is definitely a 1000M port, but I guess the routing has not been optimized.

Same parent company, two different brands, let’s take a look at vps.net’s VPS evaluation, recommended reading:

vps.net Los Angeles SSDVPS evaluation and brief introduction to backend usage

Recommended site searches: Chinese IP segment, website ICP registration, registration-free virtual host, US host rental, domain name registration number query, Hong Kong server recommendation, Hong Kong high-defense server, European server, US server, Wanwang space price, < /p>