Oneprovider Los Angeles 50% off VPS simple review

Oneprovider.com has recently launched a promotion for VPS in several computer rooms in the United States. I got a 512M memory VPS from oneprovider's Los Angeles computer room from a group of friends. There is nothing particularly easy to test. The main reason is to let everyone know about the Los Angeles computer room. The general situation of VPS, the main data I posted include:

Test the network on the VPS: upload and download, return conditions, and simply run Unixbench to roughly check the machine's condition. If you think it still meets your expectations, then check out "OneProvider-50% off VPS promotion in summer/$2.5/KVM/512m memory/20gSSD/1T traffic"

Through the IP, we can see that we finally arrived at nobistech.net, which was the original UBI computer room. It is now affiliated with leaseweb, so you don’t have to worry too much about the poor quality of the computer room. At least leaseweb’s management is still good in the industry. Very reliable.

I mainly use Guangdong Telecom here to test the backhaul line:

PING gd.189.cn (61.140.99.33) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=1 ttl=238 time=263 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=2 ttl=238 time=262 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=4 ttl=238 time=262 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=7 ttl=238 time=262 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=9 ttl=238 time=267 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=17 ttl=238 time=262 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=18 ttl=238 time=263 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=19 ttl=238 time=263 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=22 ttl=238 time=263 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=23 ttl=238 time=263 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=26 ttl=238 time=262 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=27 ttl=238 time=263 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=28 ttl=238 time=264 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=29 ttl=238 time=265 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=30 ttl=238 time=262 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=31 ttl=238 time=262 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=32 ttl=238 time=262 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=33 ttl=238 time=266 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=34 ttl=238 time=267 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=35 ttl=238 time=263 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=37 ttl=238 time=263 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=38 ttl=238 time=264 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=39 ttl=238 time=262 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=40 ttl=238 time=262 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=41 ttl=238 time=263 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=42 ttl=238 time=270 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=43 ttl=238 time=262 ms 64 bytes from 61.140.99.33: icmp_seq=44 ttl=238 time=263 ms ^C — gd.189.cn ping statistics — 44 packets transmitted, 28 received, 36% packet loss, time 43125ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 262.818/263.983/270.350/1.840 ms

Return trip:

root@test:~# traceroute gd.189.cn traceroute to gd.189.cn (61.140.99.33), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 23.104.81.126 (23.104.81.126) 0.466 ms 0.447 ms 0.436 ms 2 v410.er02.lax.as15003.net (64.120.8.1) 0.455 ms 0.445 ms 0.435 ms 3 v3500.er01.lax.as15003.net (23.80.6.137) 0.426 ms 0.549 ms 0.539 ms 4 69.31.114.133 (69.31.114.133) 0.529 ms 0.577 ms 1.562 ms 5 218.30.53.37 (218.30.53.37) 102.290 ms as4134.lax20.ip4.gtt.net (77.67.68.102) 116.553 ms 116.544 ms 6 202.97.50.29 (202.97.50.29) 1.695 ms 2.857 ms 2.851 ms 7 202.97.51.113 (202.97.51.113) 156.723 ms 156.724 ms 156.721 ms 8 202.97.61.221 (202.97.61.221) 157.192 ms * * 9 202.97.34.113 (202.97.34.113) 263.348 ms 202.97.33.201 (202.97.33.201) 152.411 ms 152.412 ms 10 61.144.3.25 (61.144.3.25) 156.025 ms 156.009 ms 156.010 ms 11 113.98.103.114 (113.98.103.114) 162.214 ms 183.56.30.102 (183.56.30.102) 255.986 ms 178.178.42.59.broad.gz.gd.dynamic.163data.com.cn (59.42 .178.178) 261.543 ms 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * 210.131.135.219.broad.gz.gd.dynamic.163data.com.cn (219.135.131.210) 151.732 ms 151.706 ms 15 210.131.135.219.broad.gz.gd.dynamic.163data.com.cn (219.135.131.210) 152.239 ms 151.966 ms *

With a single-core score of over 2,000, the performance is still very good!

speedtest-cli doesn’t know why the link to speedtest failed. DNS and other settings are normal, and there are no problems when contacting others. I don’t understand, so there is no test!

Recommended site search: Hong Kong virtual host space, asp host space, registration-free virtual host, cancellation registration, free US host, Korean cn2 server, cheap domain name, foreign host, website registration domain name query, high defense server,