WootHosting 4GB RAM Miami OpenVZ VPS Review

Details: WootHosting: $19/year/2GB memory/50GB space/2TB traffic/OpenVZ/Los Angeles/Miami/New York The so-called CLOUD RESOURCE POOL is a big hen. You can open multiple chickens. This model costs 30 dollars and can open 4. You can choose data centers in Los Angeles, New York, and Miami, or just build one. It has strong configuration. Look at it this way. , actually pretty good. The network is average, the IO is pretty good, but the configuration is not as good as Los Angeles.

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

CPU model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz Number of cores: 4 CPU frequency: 2400.333 MHz Total size of Disk: 100.0 GB (0.5 GB Used) Total amount of Mem: 4096 MB (8 MB Used) Total amount of Swap: 0 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime: 0 days, 19 hours 22 minutes Load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 OS: CentOS 7.2.1511 Arch: x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel: 2.6.32-042stab125.5 -------------------------------------------------- ------------------- I/O speed (1st run): 870 MB/s I/O speed (2nd run): 861 MB/s I/O speed (3rd run): 934 MB/s Average I/O speed: 888.3 MB/s -------------------------------------------------- ------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 65.7MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 73.0KB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 1.15MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 2.19MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 3.20MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 927KB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 2.10MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 1.06MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 1.01MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 598KB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 1.33MB/s

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by fdcservers.net (Miami, FL) [4.24 km]: 3.051 ms Testing download speed................................................ ............................. Download: 157.56 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................ ................................................................. Upload: 136.11 Mbit/s

3. Mainland China access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 0.316947 s, 847 MB/s

5. UnixBench scores

Benchmark Run: Thu Dec 28 2017 08:33:39 - 09:02:05 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 19991455.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2918.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1783.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 405330.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 105075.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 862247.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 868892.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 92364.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4923.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2891.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 636.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1320746.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 19991455.2 1713.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2918.0 530.6 ExeclThroughput 43.0 1783.9 414.8 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 405330.9 1023.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 105075.5 634.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 862247.8 1486.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 868892.0 698.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 92364.4 230.9 Process Creation 126.0 4923.6 390.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2891.2 681.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 636.9 1061.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1320746.4 880.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 703.2 -------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- Benchmark Run: Thu Dec 28 2017 09:02:05 - 09:32:25 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 42353000.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 11103.0 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 6256.5 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 357264.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 99367.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 733178.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1504879.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 239181.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 14008.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7895.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 900.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2701143.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 42353000.9 3629.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11103.0 2018.7 ExeclThroughput 43.0 6256.5 1455.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 357264.3 902.2 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 99367.7 600.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 733178.5 1264.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1504879.4 1209.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 239181.9 598.0 Process Creation 126.0 14008.9 1111.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7895.1 1862.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 900.3 1500.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2701143.6 1800.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1326.0

6. Packet loss test

Ping from 192.168.103.55 to 167.160.xxx.xxx ================================================== ============================ 12/28 19:42:01.442 Ping to 167.160.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 12/28 19:42:02.430 Timeout #1 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 12/28 19:42:03.430 Timeout #2 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 12/28 19:42:03.734 PingMin #3 Reply 32 bytes from 167.160.xxx.xxx: time=300ms TTL=48, ave=300.00ms 12/28 19:42:05.430 Timeout #4 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 12/28 19:42:06.430 Timeout #5 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 12/28 19:42:07.430 Timeout #6 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 12/28 19:42:07.737 PingMax #7 Reply 32 bytes from 167.160.xxx.xxx: time=302ms TTL=48, ave=301.00ms 12/28 19:42:09.430 Timeout #8 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 12/28 19:42:10.430 Timeout #9 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 12/28 19:42:11.430 Timeout #10 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 12/28 19:42:11.739 PingMax #11 Reply 32 bytes from 167.160.xxx.xxx: time=303ms TTL=48, ave=301.67ms 12/28 19:42:13.430 Timeout #12 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 12/28 19:42:15.430 Timeout #14 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 12/28 19:42:16.430 Timeout #15 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 12/28 19:42:16.736 PingMax #16 Reply 32 bytes from 167.160.xxx.xxx: time=304ms TTL=48, ave=302.00ms 12/28 19:42:18.430 Timeout #17 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 12/28 19:42:18.739 PingMax #18 Reply 32 bytes from 167.160.xxx.xxx: time=305ms TTL=48, ave=302.50ms 12/28 19:42:19.747 PingMax #19 Reply 32 bytes from 167.160.xxx.xxx: time=313ms TTL=48, ave=304.00ms 12/28 19:42:21.430 Timeout #20 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 12/28 19:42:21.430 === 20 valid sent, 7 received, 65.00% lost, 304.00ms average === --- Results & Statistics------------------------------------------------- ---------- Start time: 2017/12/28 19:42:01 Elapsed time: 000:00:20 End time: 2017/12/28 19:42:21 ---------------- 20 total sent 0 Invalid reception (other errors except timeout) ---------------- 20 valid sent 7 effective reception 13 timed out (65.00% lost) Ping minimum value 300ms, maximum value 313ms, average value 304.00ms

7. Route tracing telecommunications

China Unicom

Recommended site searches: domain name registration query, US host network, Guangzhou host rental, php virtual space, US virtual host, US virtual space, telecom hosting, query whether a domain name is registered, website registration domain name query, foreign free space