rfchost Singapore triple network direct connection KVM virtual VPS simple evaluation

rfchost quietly installed the Singapore data center (there are currently 4 data centers: Los Angeles, Russia, Singapore, and Hong Kong). Some people have tried it and said that it is a triple-network direct connection and the effect is very good. Yes, I got a VPS from rfchost's Singapore computer room here for everyone to test. I hope it will be helpful to those who want to find a fast and reliable VPS in an Asian computer room that does not require registration. I personally got a VPS with 512M memory and installed an ubuntu 16.04 64-bit system. The system comes with integrated BBR. This needs everyone's attention!

Updated in 2019: Singapore VPS, collected and summarized by common merchants for easy comparison and purchase in Singapore

Rfchost-American dcs computer room/CN2/Xen/network explosion/simple test

rfchost-Hong Kong 100M direct connection/SunnyVision computer room/paid VPS evaluation

rfchost-Russian VPS, direct connection to three networks, simple evaluation

SGP 512M Memory: 512M CPU: 1 core Hard disk: 10G Port: 125M Traffic: 500G/month IPv4: 1 Price: $6.99/month Purchase link	SGP 1G Memory: 1G CPU: 1 core Hard disk: 15G Port: 1Gbps Traffic: 1000G/month IPv4: 1 Price: $9.99/month Purchase link
SGP 2G Memory: 2G CPU: 2 cores Hard disk: 20G Port: 1Gbps Traffic: 1500G/month IPv4: 1 Price: $15.99/month Purchase link	SGP 4G Memory: 4G CPU: 4 cores Hard disk: 30G Port: 1Gbps Traffic: 2500G/month IPv4: 1 Price: $25.99/month Purchase link

Take a look at the screenshot below: The official said it uses E3-1230v5 CPU and 125M port. You can check it out yourself.

Use speed test to test it. Is this 1Gbps?

Return: to China Unicom, take PCCW’s Hong Kong node

On the return trip to China Telecom, it is also related to pccw. There are still slight differences in the details. Please take a closer look:

The ping data of 95 nodes of ipip.net in mainland China has an average of 71 milliseconds, which is pretty good:

At least there is no twist

The official system used has BBR integrated by default,

I pull the files on the 100M port of my rectified Los Angeles data center in the United States on the VPS. The average speed is pretty good, right?

Pull files from mainland China on the VPS, specifically a game software on rj.baidu.com. We can see that Baidu seems to have a CDN, and the call seems to be 60.190.116.47 (Zhejiang Wenzhou Telecom IP). The speed is around 8M:

My local (Guangzhou Unicom) downloaded the 1G file on the Singapore VPS directly in the browser. I have closed all x, and I am sure it is a local network download:

On our server (Guangdong Huizhou Telecom, 100M shared) directly drag the 1G file on the Singapore VPS, the speed is about 7M per second:

Taken together, whether it is dragging files in from the outside or dragging files out from the outside, overall, the speed is within our ideal range, right? Are we relatively satisfied with the speed of a VPS that can at least achieve this effect?

Let’s score a final score, here’s the unix bench mark:

Recommended site searches: website registration domain name query, website registration information query, virtual host, permanent free server address, Beijing domain name registration, domain name server, high defense US server, large bandwidth server rental, space registration, personal virtual host, < /p>