Evaluation: WKHOST 512M/20G/500G/100Mbps/ Los Angeles, USA Simple test

Review: WKHOST 512M/20G/500G/ 100Mbps/ Simple test in Los Angeles, USA

WKHOST official website address: http://www.wkhost.cn/

I took one from the official website for a simple test, taking the following package as an example:

Testing begins:

I won’t leave out ping and mtr. The previous post contains: http://vpsping.com/ ?p=1576

TOP:

top – 21:29:32 up 41 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Tasks: 19 total, 1 running, 18 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 524288k total, 46204k used, 478084k free, 0k buffers Swap: 1048576k total, 0k used, 1048576k free, 37264k cached

PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1 root 20 0 2896 1372 1192 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.01 init 2 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd/1006 3 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper/1006 133 root 16 -4 2460 656 416 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 udevd 468 root 20 0 36024 1344 1000 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.01 rsyslogd 500 root 20 0 9004 1020 480 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 sshd 508 root 20 0 3272 904 700 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 xinetd 517 root 20 0 9204 808 300 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 saslauthd 518 root 20 0 9204 564 56 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 saslauthd 541 root 20 0 12800 1968 716 S 0.0 0.4 0:00.02 sendmail 550 smmsp 20 0 12616 1748 636 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.00 sendmail 559 root 20 0 11316 3252 1804 S 0.0 0.6 0:00.02 httpd 564 apache 20 0 11316 2108 636 S 0.0 0.4 0:00.00 httpd 569 root 20 0 3980 1180 612 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.00 crond 576 root 20 0 2004 496 444 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 mingetty 577 root 20 0 2004 504 444 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 mingetty 601 root 20 0 12056 4004 3256 S 0.0 0.8 0:00.07 sshd

CPU:

bogomips : 7000.01 clflush size: 64 cache_alignment: 64 address sizes: 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management:

processor: 3 vendor_id: GenuineIntel cpu family: 6 model: 60 model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz stepping : 3 microcode: 26 CPU MHz: 3501.000 cache size: 8192 KB physical id: 0 siblings : 8 coreid: 3 CPU cores: 4 API ID: 6 initial API: 6 fpu:yes fpu_exception: yes cpuid level: 13 wp:yes flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdt scp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmp erf cpuid_faulting pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xs ave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm ida arat epb pln pts dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flex priority ept vpid fsgsbase bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm xsaveopt bogomips : 7000.01 clflush size: 64 cache_alignment: 64 address sizes: 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management:

WEGET:

–2015-07-08 21:31:13– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test Resolving host cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175 Connecting cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… Connected. HTTP request sent, waiting for response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: "100mb.test"

100%[============================================ ================================================== ================================>] 104,857,600 94.7M/s in 1.1s

2015-07-08 21:31:14 (94.7 MB/s) – Saved “100mb.test” [104857600/104857600])

Hard disk:

[root@test ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync Recorded the read of 4096+0 Recorded 4096+0 writes 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 1.22307 seconds, 219 MB/second [root@test ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync Recorded the read of 4096+0 Recorded 4096+0 writes 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 0.848565 seconds, 316 MB/second [root@test ~]#

Finally, here’s a one-click package:

CPU model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz Number of cores: 4 CPU frequency: 800.000 MHz Total amount of RAM: 512 MB Total amount of swap: 1024 MB System uptime: 44 minutes, Download speed from CacheFly: 90.5MB/s Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 1.42MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 48.7MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 12.7MB/s Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 7.70MB/s Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 6.45MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 9.59MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 70.0MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 102MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 33.8MB/s I/O speed: 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.04384 seconds, 1.0 GB/second

Overall evaluation: three stars, quite satisfactory, and the performance is not bad in all aspects. As mentioned before, it may be because the machine is relatively new and there are fewer users. In addition, the price is not bad. If you need it, buy it. My personal suggestion is still It’s better to pay monthly and back up your data safely at any time.

Recommended site searches: IP address query, Hong Kong cn2 server, US host recommendation, domain name, registration-free jsp space, registered domain name purchase, dynamic mainland China IP agent, IP agent, IP address search, domain name,