WootHosting 2GB RAM Chicago KVM VPS Review

Details: WootHosting: $18/year/1GB memory/30GB space/3TB traffic/KVM/Chicago/New York/Los Angeles WootHosting Chicago VPS is hosted in the servercentral.com data center (actually still cc), and the speed in mainland China is pretty good. For low-price VPS businesses like this, it is generally recommended to choose less popular ones such as the Eastern United States, which have poor ping and fast speeds, and do not focus on the Western United States (the ping is good, but the speed is slow).

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

CPU model: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of cores: 2 CPU frequency: 2400.084 MHz Total size of Disk: 48.0 GB (0.9 GB Used) Total amount of Mem: 2010 MB (238 MB Used) Total amount of Swap: 2047 MB ​​(0 MB Used) System uptime: 0 days 0 hours 4 minutes Load average: 0.19, 0.15, 0.06 OS: Debian GNU/Linux 8 Arch: x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel: 3.16.0-4-amd64 Virt : kvm -------------------------------------------------- ------------------- I/O speed (32M): 241 MB/s I/O speed (256M): 77.4 MB/s I/O speed (2G): 115 MB/s Average I/O speed: 144.5 MB/s -------------------------------------------------- ------------------- Node Name Upload Speed ​​Download Speed ​​Latency Normal Node 64.72 Mbit/s 78.41 Mbit/s 23.638 ms Xiangyang CT 19.37 Mbit/s 20.32 Mbit/s 380.134 ms Chengdu CT 30.30 Mbit/s 28.18 Mbit/s 254.232 ms Xi'an CU 27.91 Mbit/s 12.31 Mbit/s 359.396 ms Shanghai CU 21.08 Mbit/s 5.27 Mbit/s 247.509 ms Chongqing CU 17.10 Mbit/s 10.22 Mbit/s 315.358 ms Xi'an CM 30.44 Mbit/s 16.28 Mbit/s 278.109 ms Shanghai CM 17.25 Mbit/s 9.34 Mbit/s 241.113 ms Chengdu CM 22.84 Mbit/s 11.36 Mbit/s 278.677 ms -------------------------------------------------- ------------------- Total time: 4 minutes 22 seconds Current time: 2018-04-22 18:53:27 Finished!

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by InnSys Inc (Toronto, ON) [94.56 km]: 22.524 ms Testing download speed................................................ ............................. Download: 80.66 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................ ................................................................. Upload: 102.42 Mbit/s

3. Mainland China access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 7.59933 s, 35.3 MB/s

5. UnixBench scores

Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 22 2018 19:06:56 - 19:34:58 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 19543082.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2777.7 MWIPS (9.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 836.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 540167.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 159496.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1095607.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1346548.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 186406.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 2816.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3471.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 969.0 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2777460.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 19543082.5 1674.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2777.7 505.0 ExeclThroughput 43.0 836.7 194.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 540167.4 1364.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 159496.8 963.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1095607.6 1889.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1346548.4 1082.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 186406.3 466.0 Process Creation 126.0 2816.7 223.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3471.7 818.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 969.0 1615.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2777460.4 1851.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 833.8 -------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 22 2018 19:34:58 - 20:03:08 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 35504731.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 5405.3 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4961.6 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 753528.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 187342.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1762778.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2547226.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 348665.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 8736.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6675.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1189.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4262132.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 35504731.5 3042.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5405.3 982.8 ExeclThroughput 43.0 4961.6 1153.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 753528.5 1902.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 187342.6 1132.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1762778.9 3039.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2547226.7 2047.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 348665.4 871.7 Process Creation 126.0 8736.6 693.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6675.8 1574.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1189.7 1982.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4262132.3 2841.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1583.2

6. Packet loss test

Ping from 192.168.0.29 to 75.102.xxx.xxx ================================================== ============================ 04/23 09:01:40.380 Ping to 75.102.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 04/23 09:01:40.621 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=237ms TTL=43, ave=237.00ms 04/23 09:01:41.634 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=250ms TTL=43, ave=243.50ms 04/23 09:01:45.642 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=261ms TTL=43, ave=245.33ms 04/23 09:01:46.619 PingMin #7 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=236ms TTL=43, ave=244.00ms 04/23 09:01:48.682 PingMax #9 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=300ms TTL=43, ave=249.33ms 04/23 09:02:11.619 PingMin #32 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=235ms TTL=43, ave=246.03ms 04/23 09:02:51.890 PingMax #72 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=506ms TTL=43, ave=249.53ms 04/23 09:03:19.621 === 100 valid sent, 100 received, 0.00% lost, 250.78ms average === --- Results & Statistics------------------------------------------------- ---------- Start time: 2018/04/23 09:01:40 Elapsed time: 000:01:39 End time: 2018/04/23 09:03:19 ---------------- 100 total sent 0 Invalid reception (other errors except timeout) ---------------- 100 valid sent 100 valid reception 0 timed out (0.00% lost) Ping minimum value 235ms, maximum value 506ms, average value 250.78ms

7. Route tracing telecommunications

China Unicom

8. Youtube speed test

Recommended site searches: PHP virtual space, Wanwang domain name space, registered and unregistered domain names, free US hosting, dynamic vps instant IP replacement, international domain names, Hong Kong hosting high defense, host server rental, domain name purchase, website registration information Query,