Tospeed 512MB memory SSD hard drive Novosibirsk KVM VPS review

Details: Tospeed: 20 yuan/month/512MB memory/10GB SSD space/3TB traffic/KVM/Novosibirsk KVM VPS with SSD hard disk has excellent network, performance, and I/O. If it can operate stably for a long time, it is worth buying.

1. System information, bandwidth test

CPU model: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of cores: 1 CPU frequency: 4200.028 MHz Total size of Disk: 9.4 GB (1.2 GB Used) Total amount of Mem: 490 MB (337 MB Used) Total amount of Swap: 511 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime: 0 days, 13 hours 53 minutes Load average: 0.54, 0.16, 0.05 OS: CentOS 6.9 Arch: x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel: 2.6.32-696.23.1.el6.x86_64 ip: 185.135.xxx.xxx ipaddr : Russia Novosibirsk Oblast Novosibirsk adman.com vm : kvm Node Name: IPv4 address: Download Speed CacheFly: 205.234.175.175: 12.71 MiB/s | 101.68 Mbps Linode, Tokyo, JP: 106.187.96.148: 11.64 MiB/s | 93.13 Mbps Linode, Tokyo2, JP: 139.162.65.37: 2.68 MiB/s | 21.43 Mbps Linode, Singapore, SG: 139.162.23.4: 2.13 MiB/s | 17.01 Mbps Linode, Fremont, CA: 50.116.14.9: 709.42 KiB/s | 5.54 Mbps Linode, Newark, NJ: 50.116.57.237: 5.57 MiB/s | 44.54 Mbps Linode, London, UK: 176.58.107.39: 10.88 MiB/s | 87.03 Mbps Linode, Frankfurt, DE: 139.162.130.8: 11.39 MiB/s | 91.15 Mbps Softlayer, Tokyo, JP: 161.202.125.20: 1.53 MiB/s | 12.21 Mbps Softlayer, Singapore, SG: 119.81.28.170: 2.96 MiB/s | 23.69 Mbps Softlayer, Seoul, KR: 119.81.28.170: 2.87 MiB/s | 22.93 Mbps Softlayer, HongKong, CN: 119.81.130.170: 4.00 MiB/s | 31.99 Mbps Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 169.48.124.82: 2.20 MiB/s | 17.57 Mbps Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 67.228.112.250: 2.20 MiB/s | 17.58 Mbps Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE: 159.122.69.4: 9.64 MiB/s | 77.10 Mbps Softlayer, Paris, FR: 159.8.64.212: 8.78 MiB/s | 70.22 Mbps Leaseweb, HongKong, CN: 43.249.36.49: 3.48 MiB/s | 27.87 Mbps Leaseweb, Singapore, SG: 103.254.153.18: 5.93 MiB/s | 47.42 Mbps Leaseweb, Washington D.C., US: 207.244.94.80: 5.54 MiB/s | 44.29 Mbps Leaseweb, San Francisco, US: 209.58.135.187: 2.22 MiB/s | 17.78 Mbps Leaseweb, Netherlands, NL: 5.79.108.33: 6.40 MiB/s | 51.16 Mbps OVH, Montreal, CA: 192.99.19.165: 3.27 MiB/s | 26.13 Mbps ChinaTelecom, Shanghai, CN: 101.95.48.41: 830.66 KiB/s | 6.49 Mbps ChinaTelecom, Beijing, CN: 60.247.96.2: 1.08 MiB/s | 8.62 Mbps ChinaUnicom, Beijing, CN: 61.135.202.2: 5.43 MiB/s | 43.46 Mbps ChinaTelecom, Guangzhou, CN: 119.145.88.166: 4.21 MiB/s | 33.68 Mbps ChinaMobile, Guangzhou, CN: 221.179.46.222: 204.45 KiB/s | 1.60 Mbps ChinaTelecom, Hefei, CN: 61.191.111.11: 7.41 MiB/s | 59.30 Mbps ChinaUnicom, Hefei, CN: 112.122.10.26: 8.67 MiB/s | 69.35 Mbps ChinaMobile, Hefei, CN: 120.209.140.60: 2.30 MiB/s | 18.42 Mbps Hinet, Taiwan, TW: 210.61.132.1: 4.26 MiB/s | 34.09 Mbps

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Akado Telecom (Moscow) [0.15 km]: 81.515 ms Testing download speed........................................ Download: 242.40 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................ Upload: 173.45 Mbit/s

3. Mainland China access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

ioping: seek rate min/avg/max/mdev = 22.5 us / 51.6 us / 14.0 ms / 175.3 us ioping: sequential speed generated 12.0 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.92 GiB, 2.39 k iops, 598.3 MiB/s

5. UnixBench scores

Benchmark Run: Tue May 15 2018 11:36:57 - 12:05:21 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 48080249.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4095.9 MWIPS (11.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4606.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 428998.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 117549.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1296243.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 656128.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 175828.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 14132.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5584.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 755.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 649009.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 48080249.7 4120.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4095.9 744.7 ExeclThroughput 43.0 4606.9 1071.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 428998.3 1083.3 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 117549.4 710.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1296243.0 2234.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 656128.9 527.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 175828.0 439.6 Process Creation 126.0 14132.0 1121.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5584.0 1317.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 755.4 1259.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 649009.0 432.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1004.4

6. Packet loss test

Ping from 192.168.16.243 to 185.135.xxx.xxx ================================================== ============================ 05/15 11:38:47.541 Ping to 185.135.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 05/15 11:38:47.669 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=121ms TTL=52, ave=121.00ms 05/15 11:38:48.667 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=119ms TTL=52, ave=120.00ms 05/15 11:39:01.671 PingMax #15 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=124ms TTL=52, ave=119.60ms 05/15 11:39:08.663 PingMin #22 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=118ms TTL=52, ave=119.55ms 05/15 11:39:09.672 PingMax #23 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=130ms TTL=52, ave=120.00ms 05/15 11:40:06.681 PingMax #80 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=137ms TTL=52, ave=119.96ms 05/15 11:40:25.683 PingMax #99 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=138ms TTL=52, ave=120.06ms 05/15 11:40:26.674 === 100 valid sent, 100 received, 0.00% lost, 120.06ms average === --- Results & Statistics------------------------------------------------- ---------- Start time: 2018/05/15 11:38:47 Elapsed time: 000:01:39 End time: 2018/05/15 11:40:26 ---------------- 100 total sent 0 Invalid reception (other errors except timeout) ---------------- 100 valid sent 100 valid reception 0 timed out (0.00% lost) Ping minimum value 118ms, maximum value 138ms, average value 120.06ms

7. Route tracing telecommunications

China Unicom

Move

8. Youtube speed test

Recommended site searches: icp registration number, server high defense Hong Kong Telecom ip agent, Guangzhou host rental, cloud host rental, Beijing domain name registration, domain name registration query, domain name query network, public network ip, virtual host Hong Kong host,

p>