MoonVM 1GB memory 100Mbps bandwidth Taiwan KVM VPS review

Details: MoonVM: $30/month/1GB memory/10GB SSD space/3TB traffic/KVM/Taiwan The performance is good, the network is very good, the bandwidth is strong, and the IP can be switched with one click in the background. It is worth buying! Welcome to the TeleGram group discussion: https://t.me/us

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

CPU Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v3 @ 2.40GHz CPU Cores: 1 Core @ 2399.998 MHz x86_64 CPU Cache: 4096 KB OS: Debian GNU/Linux 8 (64 Bit) KVM Kernel: 4.12.9-041209-generic Total Space: 18.0 GB (1.3 GB Used) Total RAM: 988 MB (313 MB Used 13 MB Buff) Total SWAP: 1023 MB (0 MB Used) Uptime: 0 days 3 hours 17 minutes Load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 ASN & ISP: AS3462, HiNet Organization: HiNet Location: Taichung, Taiwan / TW Region: Taichung City -------------------------------------------------- ------------------- I/O Speed(1.0GB): 555 MB/s I/O Speed(1.0GB): 608 MB/s I/O Speed(1.0GB): 634 MB/s Average I/O Speed: 599.0 MB/s -------------------------------------------------- ------------------- Node Name Upload Speed ​​Download Speed ​​Latency Speedtest.net 98.72 Mbit/s 95.10 Mbit/s 5.893 ms Shanghai CT 98.08 Mbit/s 86.08 Mbit/s 61.79 ms Kunming CT 77.54 Mbit/s 93.96 Mbit/s 23.464 ms Shanghai CU 81.13 Mbit/s 63.04 Mbit/s 60.277 ms Xi'an CU 89.56 Mbit/s 49.37 Mbit/s 85.858 ms Chongqing CU 96.52 Mbit/s 81.74 Mbit/s 54.091 ms Xi'an CM 75.21 Mbit/s 57.96 Mbit/s 69.637 ms Chengdu CM 101.81 Mbit/s 42.66 Mbit/s 71.665 ms -------------------------------------------------- ------------------- Finished in: 4 min 28 sec Timestamp: 2018-07-09 14:42:13 GMT+8

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Chief Telecom (Taichung) [1.78 km]: 4.481 ms Testing download speed........................ Download: 69.99 Mbit/s Testing upload speed........................ Upload: 73.97 Mbit/s

3. Mainland China access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 2.54861 ​​s, 105 MB/s

5. UnixBench scores

Benchmark Run: Mon Jul 09 2018 13:33:59 - 14:02:04 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 30772501.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3948.3 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5904.8 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1247446.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 354355.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3233406.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2306697.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 381486.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 16471.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10161.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1331.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3864413.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 30772501.2 2636.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3948.3 717.9 ExeclThroughput 43.0 5904.8 1373.2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1247446.4 3150.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 354355.4 2141.1 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3233406.9 5574.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2306697.6 1854.3 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 381486.0 953.7 Process Creation 126.0 16471.9 1307.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10161.6 2396.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1331.5 2219.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3864413.3 2576.3 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1953.9

6. Packet loss test

Ping from 192.168.0.29 to 36.234.xxx.xxx ================================================== ============================ 07/09 14:38:22.414 Ping to 36.234.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 07/09 14:38:22.492 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 36.234.xxx.xxx: time=72ms TTL=49, ave=72.00ms 07/09 14:38:23.481 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 36.234.xxx.xxx: time=67ms TTL=49, ave=69.50ms 07/09 14:38:25.237 Timeout #3 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 07/09 14:38:29.238 Timeout #7 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 07/09 14:38:32.498 PingMax #11 Reply 32 bytes from 36.234.xxx.xxx: time=83ms TTL=49, ave=69.67ms 07/09 14:38:36.502 PingMax #15 Reply 32 bytes from 36.234.xxx.xxx: time=89ms TTL=49, ave=70.69ms 07/09 14:38:40.529 PingMax #19 Reply 32 bytes from 36.234.xxx.xxx: time=112ms TTL=49, ave=72.53ms 07/09 14:38:48.536 PingMax #27 Reply 32 bytes from 36.234.xxx.xxx: time=121ms TTL=49, ave=74.36ms 07/09 14:39:27.568 PingMax #66 Reply 32 bytes from 36.234.xxx.xxx: time=149ms TTL=49, ave=73.72ms 07/09 14:39:48.237 Timeout #86 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 07/09 14:39:51.237 Timeout #89 *****(32 bytes) Request timeout. 07/09 14:40:01.530 === 100 valid sent, 96 received, 4.00% lost, 74.55ms average === --- Results & Statistics------------------------------------------------- ---------- Start time: 2018/07/09 14:38:22 Elapsed time: 000:01:39 End time: 2018/07/09 14:40:01 ---------------- 100 total sent 0 Invalid reception (other errors except timeout) ---------------- 100 valid sent 96 valid reception 4 timed out (4.00% lost) Ping minimum value 67ms, maximum value 149ms, average value 74.55ms

7. Route tracing telecommunications

China Unicom

Move

8. Youtube speed test

Recommended site search: domain name registration price, Hong Kong server purchase ws domain name, server Hong Kong, Hong Kong space which is the best space to rent domain name space purchase, how to register domain name, telecommunications host, domain name agent,