desivps: A simple evaluation of VPS in the Los Angeles data center in the United States to see how desivps is

desivps recently launched a special promotional VPS for Chinese customers (you can switch to IPv4 for free 6 times a year, as low as $20/year). We are very curious about the situation of this desivps and whether it is worth buying. With these questions in mind, I directly got a VPS. Let me share the evaluation data directly below, for reference only!

US VPS, Netherlands VPS

Free IPv6, one free snapshot, and you can change IP 6 times for free per year

Judging from the VPS I got, the main frequency is 2.4GHz and the hard disk I/O is about 466MB/S. The webmaster habitually turns on BBR for the VPS:

FIO test hard disk read and write results:

The uplink bandwidth and downlink bandwidth of VPS are the parameters we focus on. Let’s test it with speedtest’s China node. The results show that the downlink bandwidth is 1Gbps, and the uplink bandwidth for each VPS is limited to 100Mbps:

Test again during the evening peak period:

speedtest other node tests in Asia:

iperf3 test Europe and America:

Test the files stored on the VPS and download them directly from Chrome to see the speed:

Compared with the speed during the leisure time during the day, the speed of the evening peak is attenuated by 30%:

Follow PING, the data of 80 nodes in mainland China provided by ping.chinaz.com:

For outbound telecommunications, take COGENTCO:

For China Unicom's outbound journey, take Comcast:

Mobile outbound, CMI followed by cogentco:

For the return trip, go to China Telecom: in the direction of Beijing, the Los Angeles telecom node is directly connected to the country; in the direction of Shanghai and Guangzhou, take the Los Angeles telia

For the return trip, go to China Unicom: Los Angeles or San Jose level 3 docking AS4837 to return to China

Return to mainland China: Return directly from San Jose or Seattle mobile nodes

Just take a look at the Unixbench scores:

To summarize:

For telecommunications, take cogentco for the outbound trip and telia for the return trip;

China Unicom takes Comcast for the outbound journey and AS4837 for the return journey at level 3;

The outbound mobile journey is via CMI to cogentco, and the return journey is directly connected;

Judging from the current situation, the effect of China Telecom may be poor. At least the routing of China Unicom and China Mobile seems to be better; the actual situation still needs to be tested by everyone to know.

Recommended site search: domain name quick registration, free asp space, com domain name, US server defense, free asp space application, registration and cancellation, US server rental, website registration time, proxy IP address, expired registered domain name query,