hncloud: Evaluation of CN2 line independent server in Los Angeles data center in the United States, large bandwidth of outbound backbone considers defense, return CN2+AS9929

hncloud (Warner Cloud, a brand of United Communications International Co., Ltd. of Hong Kong) focuses on cloud server and independent server services in data centers in Los Angeles, USA and Hong Kong, China. It follows the CN2+BGP optimization route. The official also provides a paid version with up to 800Gbps. DDoS defense, generally speaking, the access speed in mainland China is fast and it can also provide defense. Recently, the official is running a promotion, which is very cost-effective and has unprecedented discounts. Many people come to ask our webmaster about the performance of hncloud's independent server in the US computer room. For such questions, I usually say that I have written a review, so you can just take it and read it. Data is for reference only!

Official website: https://www.hncloud.com

The webmaster has a separate server in a computer room in Los Angeles, USA. Officially, it has 100Mbps international bandwidth + 50Mbps CN2 GIA hybrid bandwidth. Get the machine, the CPU is e5-2660v2, and test the hard disk I/O at 383MB/s:

For more accurate testing, look at FIO:

How far the server's uplink bandwidth and downlink bandwidth can be tested in mainland China is a very important parameter. We used the China node of speedtest.net to test it. The uplink basically hovered around 93Mbps, and the downlink was around 50Mbps. , please note that the test time is 4:30 pm:

Compare the above data. What we are looking at here is around 10:30 in the evening. During the peak period, when others are exploding, hncloud's US server seems to be unaffected:

speedtest.net’s other Asian node tests:

iperf3 is basically good when running in Europe and the United States:

Guangzhou Telecom only uses Chrome browser to download files on the test server. The speed reaches 11MB/S, which is almost close to full server bandwidth:

We also tested it at 9:55 during the evening peak period, and the download speed dropped to 9.8MB/S:

For those who follow ping, take a look at the test data of 80 nodes in mainland China provided by ping.chinaz.com:

Mainland China Telecom uses backbone direct connection for its outbound journey:

The outbound journey of China Unicom is also a direct backbone connection:

Outbound China Mobile, Hong Kong CMI is also directly connected:

Return to China Telecom: Take Telecom’s own high-end line CN2

Return to China Unicom: take China Unicom’s own high-end line - AS9929

Return to China Mobile: We found that we took China Unicom’s high-end line AS9929

Run a Unix bench, it seems there is a problem with the script, and the 20-core data cannot be obtained:

To summarize: the three outbound networks are equivalent to backbone direct connections (don’t be too bragging, mobile CMI is also equivalent to backbone). Perhaps it is to take into account defense issues. It is unrealistic to use AS9929 or AS4809 when being attacked. (Bandwidth is too expensive to afford and cannot be afforded), so we use backbone and large bandwidth. The three backhaul networks all use high-end lines. China Telecom uses its own CN2, and China Unicom uses its own high-end AS9929. China Mobile's high-end lines have not yet been released, but hncloud forced the use of China Unicom's AS9929. Therefore, the return journey is all straightened, and it is still a high-end line, ensuring the core of ultra-high-speed return to China.

Recommended site searches: domain name registration center, US virtual space, virtual space purchase, overseas server, Korean independent server, private server rental, check IP detailed address host space, overseas virtual host space, overseas virtual host space,