How about v.ps? Evaluation of VPS in Seattle data center on the west coast of the United States

The Seattle and San Jose data centers on the West Coast of the United States are also popular places where Chinese people like to hang out. v.ps also provides VPS (cloud servers) in the Seattle and San Jose data centers. This time, we will test the cloud servers in the Seattle data center. If you are interested, you can take a look at the cloud and mini series. The network is completely the same, but the configuration is different.

Official website: https://v.ps/

VPS features:

KVM virtualization, SSD RAID10 array, 1Gbps bandwidth, comes with an IPv4, triple network AS9929 backhaul, traffic can be purchased by DIY

Memory	CPU	SSD	Traffic	Price	Purchase
1G	1 core	20G	1T/month	€17.95/season	Link
2G	2 cores	30G	1T/month	€22.95/season	Link
4G	4 cores	40G	1T/month	€28.95/season	Link
8G	8 cores	80G	1T/month	€56.95/season	Link

The CPU is e5-2697v2 (2.7GHz), XTOM's own AS, the system comes with BBR, and the current hard disk I/O is roughly around 205MB/s:

FIO once again tested the hard disk reading and writing data:

Run the three network nodes in mainland China on speedtest.net to roughly see what the maximum uplink and downlink bandwidth can be? Approximate data:

Add a piece of test data during the evening peak backbone network explosion period:

Let’s run a few international nodes to see the actual data:

Let’s take a look at the actual results of countries or regional nodes in Asia:

Let’s take a look at the test data of several European and American 10G ports using iperf3:

Continue to look at the test data of iperf3 in the IPv6 environment:

The files stored on the test chicken are downloaded by Guangzhou Telecom using a browser to see the approximate speed:

Look at the download speed during the evening peak period:

Evening rush hour, Sichuan Chengdu China Unicom, download speed:

Evening peak, Hubei Shiyan Telecom, download speed:

Latency monitoring data of multiple nodes of three networks in mainland China:

Telecom outbound, backbone network docking with NTT:

China Unicom outbound, backbone network docking with GTT:

Moving outbound, CMI connects to cogent:

For the return trip of Telecom, take NTT to Los Angeles/San Jose, and then take Telecom’s Los Angeles/San Jose node to return directly to China:

China Unicom return trip:

Towards Beijing, take GTT to San Jose to connect with China Unicom’s backbone

For Shanghai and Guangzhou: take GTT to San Jose, and then directly connect back to China from China Unicom’s node in San Jose

To move back, take NTT to Tokyo, Japan, then to Hong Kong, and then back

Cross-regional streaming media unlocking test results:

Some streaming media unlocking tests in North America:

VPS performance test, some test data are roughly as follows:

A rough summary:

The performance of the VPS is so-so, not bad, but at least sufficient;

As for the network, China Telecom is directly connected to the backhaul, China Unicom uses GTT to connect to the backbone, and China Mobile uses NTT to Japan and then to Hong Kong and then back to the mainland. Personally, the webmaster feels that the current network pattern is not particularly ideal. Come as you like.

Recommended site searches: vps dynamic ip, vps server rental, free US host, reverse IP check, expired domain name query, US vps host, dynamic ip server, overseas server, how to register domain name, ip query,