How about shockhosting? Simple test of VPS in Denver data center

How about shockhosting? How about shockhosting Denver? Since shockhosting has been in operation for a relatively long time, and VPS has a certain cost-effectiveness, webmasters have paid more attention to it. Today I would like to share with you the situation of the vps in shockhosting’s Denver data center. The test data is for reference only. You have to get it yourself to know whether it is good or not.

Official website: https://shockhosting.net

50% off coupon code: 50OFF, valid on a recurring basis!

Memory	CPU	SSD	Traffic	Price	Purchase
2G	1 core	30G	1T/month	$5/month	Link
4G	2 cores	60G	2T/month	$10/month	Link
6G	3 cores	90G	3T/month	$15/month	Link
8G	4 cores	120G	4T/month	$20/month	Link
10G	5 cores	150G	5T/month	$25/month	Link
12G	6 cores	180G	6T/month	$30/month	Link

The main frequency is 3.2GHz, the specific model is unknown. The current test hard disk I/O is roughly 382MB/S. The webmaster has enabled BBR habitually:

FIO tests the hard disk's ability to read and write data. It seems to be better than the previous data:

Let’s use speedtest to run the uplink and downlink bandwidth on the nodes of the three networks in mainland China:

For the same test, we switch to the evening peak period when the backbone network explodes and take a look. Pay attention to the comparison:

Let’s run some international nodes in the United States, Europe, Africa, and Asia to have a rough look at the situation:

For the Asian region, we focus on a few more nodes and look at the data:

Let’s take a look at some fixed European and American nodes running iperf3:

Guangzhou Telecom downloads the files stored on Test Chicken directly using Chrome to see the speed:

For the same download, wait until the backbone network is blocked during the evening peak and check the speed:

In the evening rush hour, switch to Hubei Telecom to check the download speed:

In the evening rush hour, let’s switch to Metrolinx for downloading and see how fast it is:

Latency monitoring effect of multiple nodes in mainland China:

Telecom outbound, backbone network connected to HE.NET:

China Unicom outbound, backbone network connected to HE.NET:

Moving outbound, CMI connects with cogentco:

Return to China Telecom: Due to official settings, the route is blocked and cannot be seen...

Return to China Unicom: all via HE.NET

Return, move to mainland China:

Beijing and Shanghai take HE.NET to return to China, take HE.NET in the direction of Guangzhou and bypass the CIX data center in Germany, and then return to China from the mobile node in Frankfurt, Germany

Tiktok streaming media unlock test: US area, OK

Cross-regional streaming media unlocking test:

Results of unlocking some streaming media in North America:

Test results in terms of performance parameters:

A rough summary:

For the outbound journey, take HE and cogent; for the return journey, most of them are blocked and cannot be viewed. A few can be seen as taking HE, but I guess they are almost all HE, and there will be no special optimization. In terms of performance, the CPU performance is okay, and the hard disk I/O is also okay. Overall, there is really no advantage in moving the Denver data center to mainland China, so it’s not particularly ideal!

VPS evaluation of all shockhosting computer rooms:

Tokyo, Japan: https:// /46608.html

Singapore: https:// /46676.html

Los Angeles: https:// /46636.html

Seattle: https:// /55017.html

Denver: https:// /55315.html

Dallas: https:// /55126.html

New Jersey: https:// /55284.html

Jacksonville: https:// /55391.html

Sydney, Australia: https:// /55360.html

Recommended site searches: Chinese domain name fees, asp hosting, US server website, dynamic vps second ip change, agent ip purchase website, Hong Kong cn2 server, registration inquiry, com domain name registration, domain name registration price, hosting space,