Review: virmach annual KVM payment as low as $10 Phoenix, USA

Network test:

Frankfurt: 50.3.75.98 http://ffm.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test

New York: 107.173.176.5 http://ny.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test

Dallas: 23.95.41.200 http://dal.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test

Phoenix City: 173.213.69.188 http://phx.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test

Los Angeles: 23.94.228.141 http://la.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test

Chicago: 170.130.139.3http://chi.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test

Seattle: 104.140.22.36 http://sea.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test

Atlanta: 107.172.25.131 http://atl.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test

Please note that the actual IP obtained shall prevail.

I made the lowest deposit some time ago, and it’s been a day, so I’ll post a simple test below.

PING:

Average response of the fastest node on the line and the slowest node All US Miami [Overseas] 9 ms Henan Zhengzhou [Multiple Lines] 395 ms 202 ms Telecom Henan 174 ms Shaanxi Xi’an 381 ms 251 ms Multi-line Tianjin 172 ms Henan Zhengzhou 395 ms 225 ms China Unicom Henan 211 ms Fujian Quanzhou 306 ms 267 ms Mobile Zhejiang 187 ms Shandong 208 ms 197 ms Overseas, Los Angeles, United States, 9 ms, South Korea, 255 ms, 79 ms

MTR:

Node IP Address DNS Name Location Response Time 1 60.191.221.1 Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province Telecommunications 1 ms 2 192.168.11.5 LAN The other party is on the same intranet as you 0 ms 3 10.4.255.1 LAN The other party is on the same intranet as you 34 ms 4 122.227.23.201 Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province Telecommunications 2 ms 5 122.227.23.229 Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province Telecom 7 ms 6 202.97.82.109 China Telecom Backbone Network 11 ms 7 Request TimeOut * 8 Request TimeOut * 9 202.97.50.10 China Telecom Backbone Network 156 ms 10 202.97.50.26 China Telecom Backbone Network 166 ms 11 Request TimeOut * 12 4.69.211.26 ae-10-0.bar2.Phoenix1.Level3.net Level 3 Communications Inc., Bloomfield, Colorado, USA 177 ms 13 4.28.83.54 PHOENIX-NAP.bar2.Phoenix1.Level3.net Level 3 Communications Inc., Bloomfield, Colorado, USA 219 ms 14 Request TimeOut * 15 104.140.0.206 North America 165 ms 16 50.2.42.73 United States Infiniti Networks, Las Vegas, Texas 200 ms

top:

top – 07:19:01 up 1 day, 8:07, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.05 Tasks: 47 total, 1 running, 46 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 0.0 us, 0.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 99.8 id, 0.1 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.1 st KiB Mem: 124588 total, 122276 used, 2312 free, 20380 buffers KiB Swap: 131068 total, 0 used, 131068 free, 87136 cached

PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1 root 20 0 2280 720 620 S 0.0 0.6 0:01.47 init 2 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd 3 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.24 ksoftirqd/0 4 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:09.32 kworker/0:0 5 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kworker/u:0 6 root rt 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/0 7 root rt 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.42 watchdog/0 8 root 0 -20 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cpuset 9 root 0 -20 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper 10 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kdevtmpfs 11 root 0 -20 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 netns 12 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.26 sync_supers 13 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 bdi-default 14 root 0 -20 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kintegrityd 15 root 0 -20 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd 17 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 khungtaskd 18 root 20 0 0 0 0 D 0.0 0.0 0:00.04 kswapd0 root@us:~# uptime 07:19:46 up 1 day, 8:08, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.05 root@us:~# free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 121 118 2 0 19 84 -/+ buffers/cache: 14 107 Swap: 127 0 127 root@us:~# df -hal Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on rootfs 9.8G 516M 8.8G 6% / sysfs 0 0 0 – /sys proc 0 0 0 – /proc udev 10M 0 10M 0% /dev devpts 0 0 0 – /dev/pts tmpfs 13M 172K 12M 2% /run /dev/disk/by-uuid/e3c2a8a2-d542-489c-9f5d-0c46063b915f 9.8G 516M 8.8G 6% / tmpfs 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock tmpfs 50M 0 50M 0% /r root@us:~# df -i Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on rootfs 626944 20642 606302 4% / udev 14315 319 13996 3% /dev tmpfs 15573 224 15349 2% /run /dev/disk/by-uuid/e3c2a8a2-d542-489c-9f5d-0c46063b915f 626944 20642 606302 4% / tmpfs 15573 1 15572 1% /run/lock tmpfs 15573 2 15571 1% /run/shm

IO test: root@us:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync ^C2603+0 records in 2603+0 records out 170590208 bytes (171 MB) copied, 47.0631 s, 3.6 MB/s

One-click package test: CPU model: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of cores: 1 CPU frequency: 3591.702 MHz Total amount of RAM: 121 MB Total amount of swap: 127 MB System uptime: 1 day, 8:11, Download speed from CacheFly: 5.19MB/s Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 1.35MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 1021KB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 449KB/s

Overall: three stars. Download speeds everywhere are average. The IO of the hard drive is very poor, so it is not suitable for building a website. I placed the order from Phoenix, and the one I got seems to be from Las Vegas. The advantage is that it is cheap and has a kvm architecture. It can be used for scientific Internet access and so on. In short, it is the king of overbooking because the price is right there.

Recommended site searches: asp website space, free domain name registration platform, overseas virtual host space, large bandwidth server rental, personal virtual host, IP view, domain name registration number query, cloud server vps, virtual host rental, US space, < /p>