Offer: AlphaRacks 9.95/year/512MB/15GB space/6TB traffic/OVZ/Los Angeles

Offer:AlphaRacks 9.95/ Year/512MB/15GB space/6TB traffic/OVZ/Los Angeles

Official website address: https://www.alpharacks. com/

AlphaRacks, has launched a Halloween offer, as follows:

Traffic tripled Port upgraded to 1Gbps

Linux 1 Memory: 512 MB Hard drive: 15 GB (RAID10) Traffic: 2 TB/month IPv4:1 $9.95/year Purchase link

Linux 2 Memory: 2 GB Hard drive: 40 GB (RAID10) Traffic: 3 TB/month IPv4:1 $19/year Purchase link

Linux 3 Memory: 4 GB Hard drive: 200 GB (RAID10) Traffic: 5 TB/month IPv4:1 $10/month Purchase link

The following are three windows vps: Windows 1 CPU: 1 Memory: 1 GB Hard drive: 30 GB (RAID10) Traffic: 1.5 TB/month (100Mbps) IPv4:1 $6.85/month Purchase link

Windows 2 CPU: 2 Memory: 2 GB Hard drive: 50 GB (RAID10) Traffic: 3 TB/month (100Mbps) IPv4:1 $12.85/month Purchase link

Windows 3 CPU: 4 Memory: 4 GB Hard drive: 100 GB (RAID10) Traffic: 6 TB/month (100Mbps) IPv4:1 $24.85/month Purchase link

Data Center and Speed ​​Test: Los Angeles (QuadraNet): 198.55.111.5 http://repos.lax-noc.com/speedtests/100mb.bin

Attached is the data tested by netizens, with 2G memory.

System information and bandwidth test:

System Info ———– Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz CPU Cores: 4 Frequency: 2400.088 MHz Memory: 2048 MB Swap: 2048 MB Uptime: 46 min,

OS: CentOS release 6.6 (Final) Arch: x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel: 2.6.32-042stab117.14 Hostname: zhujiwiki Speedtest (IPv4 only) ——————— Your public IPv4 is 155.254.xxx.xxx

Location Provider Speed CDN Cachefly 17.0MB/s

Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 4.35MB/s Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 9.73MB/s Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 9.83MB/s San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 11.4MB/s Washington, DC, US Softlayer 7.54MB/s

Tokyo, Japan Linode 5.86MB/s Singapore Softlayer 2.87MB/s

Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 2.77MB/s Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 9.90MB/s Disk Speed ———- I/O (1st run): 154 MB/s I/O (2nd run): 101 MB/s I/O (3rd run): 119 MB/s Average I/O: 124.667 MB/s UnixBench score:

Benchmark Run: Wed Oct 26 2016 21:26:10 – 21:54:29 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21023244.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2767.1 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2442.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 392193.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 107283.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1002805.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 943869.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 102398.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 5530.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3242.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 979.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1362820.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21023244.2 1801.5 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2767.1 503.1 ExeclThroughput 43.0 2442.3 568.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 392193.1 990.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 107283.7 648.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1002805.3 1729.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 943869.0 758.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 102398.4 256.0 Process Creation 126.0 5530.4 438.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3242.1 764.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 979.7 1632.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1362820.6 908.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 785.6

—————————————————————— Benchmark Run: Wed Oct 26 2016 21:54:29 – 22:23:13 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 64390692.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 10901.8 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5519.2 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 210974.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 109774.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1133735.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 3208545.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 459173.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 18587.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9979.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1311.4 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3533070.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values ​​BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 64390692.0 5517.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10901.8 1982.2 ExeclThroughput 43.0 5519.2 1283.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 210974.8 532.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 109774.5 663.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1133735.7 1954.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3208545.8 2579.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 459173.5 1147.9 Process Creation 126.0 18587.6 1475.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9979.3 2353.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1311.4 2185.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3533070.0 2355.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1682.1 Server I/O performance:

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.40685 s, 78.8 MB/s Mainland China speed:

Packet loss test:

Ping from 192.168.1.186 to 155.254.xxx.xxx ================================================== ============================ 10/27 09:23:23.485 Ping to 155.254.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 10/27 09:23:23.785 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 155.254.xxx.xxx: time=221ms TTL=51, ave=221.00ms 10/27 09:23:24.716 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 155.254.xxx.xxx: time=212ms TTL=51, ave=216.50ms 10/27 09:23:25.718 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 155.254.xxx.xxx: time=227ms TTL=51, ave=220.00ms

10/27 09:23:27.765 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 155.254.xxx.xxx: time=274ms TTL=51, ave=232.00ms

10/27 09:23:30.779 PingMax #8 Reply 32 bytes from 155.254.xxx.xxx: time=277ms TTL=51, ave=241.00ms

10/27 09:23:33.816 PingMax #11 Reply 32 bytes from 155.254.xxx.xxx: time=318ms TTL=51, ave=248.55ms

10/27 09:23:42.817 === 20 valid sent, 20 received, 0.00% loss, 260.95ms average === — Results & Statistics —————————————————— Start time: 2016/10/27 09:23:23 Elapsed time: 000:00:19 End time: 2016/10/27 09:23:42 —————- 20 total sent 0 Invalid reception (other errors except timeout) —————- 20 valid sent 20 valid reception 0 timed out (0.00% lost) Ping minimum value 212ms, maximum value 318ms, average value 260.95ms

Overall review:

The 10-dollar model is considered a toy. Netizens reported that this model has severe limitations, such as CPU and memory. If it exceeds the limit, the process will be killed or the computer will crash. If the speed is not good, no matter how much traffic you provide, it will be useless. So this home is definitely oversold, let’s see if it’s reasonable. It is recommended to buy a machine with 2G memory, which will be much less than MJJ.

Recommended site search: Changsha server, buy server high defense, what is a server, forum host, asp free space, foreign space, io domain name registration, vps server rental, filing space, ip reverse check