gcorelabs: Evaluation of "cloud server-cloud" in the "Santa Clara" data center in the United States, tell you how it is

What I want to share with you today is the cloud server evaluation of gcorelabs’ Santa Clara computer room, which is the “Cloud” series, not the “Virtual Servers” (VPS) series. The VPS of gcorelabs's Santa Clara data center in the United States has a default bandwidth of 200M and unlimited traffic, and we have evaluated it before (click here: "gcorelabs: Simple evaluation of a VPS with 200M bandwidth and unlimited traffic in the Santa Clara computer room on the west coast of the United States").

Official website: https://gcore.com

Support: digital cryptocurrency, credit card, PayPal, Alipay payment

I would like to emphasize again: gcorelabs’ VPS and Cloud are two different businesses, and they are not a backend system!

Cloud click here: https://auth.gcore.com/login/signup

VPS click here: https://gcore.com/hosting/

I opened a 4G memory, 2 cores, and a 20G data disk, and turned on BBR. The test hard disk I/O was approximately 98.9MB/S:

FIO test results:

Note that it is now around 21:50 during the evening rush hour. We are preparing the China node of speedtest.net to test the uplink bandwidth and downlink bandwidth of the cloud server. Judging from the data, the cloud server's downstream bandwidth has reached a maximum of 6Gbps, and in mainland China it has reached about 2.5Gbps; the upstream international nodes can reach about 2.7Gbps, and the nodes in mainland China can reach about 487Mbps:

Test results of other nodes in Asia:

The effect of iperf3 running in Europe and America is much better:

Guangzhou Telecom, directly use the Chrome browser to download files on the cloud server, the speed is about 15.2MB/S,

In the evening, I tested again during the evening peak period. The speed was 3.1MB/S. There is still a big gap, right?

For those who are concerned about ping, take a look at the test data of 80 nodes in mainland China provided by ping.chinaz.com, tested at night:

Outbound telecommunications, backbone network directly connected to the United States:

China Unicom's outbound journey took a detour through Europe, entering from Germany, France, the Netherlands, and finally the United States

Mobile outbound journey, Hong Kong CMI connects with cogentco to the United States:

Return to China Telecom: The Beijing direction is from San Jose via cogentco to connect to the backbone network, and the Shanghai and Guangzhou directions are from the Los Angeles Telecom node directly to mainland China

Return to China Unicom: Beijing direction is to take S4808 directly back to China, Shanghai and Guangzhou directions are from San Jose to Tata Connect AS4837 to return to China

Return trip to China Mobile: directly go to China Mobile's node in the United States and come back directly

Then take a look at the Unix bench scores:

To summarize: the outbound journey is not good, and the return journey, whether it is China Telecom, China Unicom, or China Mobile, is basically straightened, so when testing the download speed, it can still achieve good results. Of course, This is related to the sufficient bandwidth of gcorelabs' cloud server. After all, the price is not cheap compared to VPS.

This site’s QQ group: 664890222, contact the webmaster: QQ3374457177 Post here and leave a message to the webmaster: https://www.hostwyn.com/viewforum.php?f=2

Recommended site search: best US server, free personal homepage space, domain name registration process, instant exchange ip server, free asp space, Hong Kong server rental, icp filing, overseas host, Dongwang host US server defense,